As a lifelong gaming enthusiast and history buff, I've always been fascinated by how video games portray different cultural eras, and recently I've been thinking about the cowboy period in particular. When Firaxis announced Civilization VII would feature sweeping changes to historical progression, it got me reflecting on how we often misunderstand the real cowboys of American history. Most people picture John Wayne riding across the screen, but the reality was far more complex and frankly, more interesting. Having spent countless hours across multiple Civilization games, I can appreciate why Firaxis is shaking up their formula - sometimes you need to break from tradition to capture historical truth, much like how we need to look beyond Hollywood to understand real cowboy culture.
Let me start with something that genuinely surprised me when I first learned it - the racial diversity among cowboys was far greater than popular culture suggests. Historical records indicate approximately 25-30% of actual cowboys were African American, with another significant percentage being Mexican vaqueros who essentially invented many cowboy techniques. This multicultural reality rarely appears in films or even in many historical games until recently. I remember playing earlier Civilization titles where cultural representations felt somewhat monolithic, and I'm thrilled that gaming as a medium is finally embracing historical accuracy in these depictions. The changes in Civilization VII's approach to historical periods seem to acknowledge this need for nuanced representation, which makes me optimistic about how they might handle the cowboy era specifically.
Another fascinating aspect that doesn't get enough attention is how temporary cowboy work actually was. The romanticized image of lifelong cowboys driving cattle year-round doesn't hold up - most cowboys were seasonal workers, with many being teenagers or young men in their early twenties working for limited periods. The average cowboy's career spanned maybe seven years before they moved on to other occupations. This temporary nature of cowboy work reminds me of how Civilization VII is apparently making historical eras more transitional rather than distinct phases. According to the preview materials, the development team has created mechanics where periods blend into one another more naturally, which could beautifully mirror how the cowboy era emerged from earlier frontier periods and gradually transformed into the industrial age.
The economic reality of cowboy life would shock most people. Contrary to the wealthy rancher stereotype, the average cowboy earned between $25-$40 per month during the 1870s - that's roughly $600-$900 in today's money when adjusted for inflation, hardly the stuff of legends. They worked brutal hours in dangerous conditions for what amounted to modest wages. This makes me think about game design choices in historical strategy games - how often do we see the economic struggles of ordinary people represented? The Civilization VII changes that apparently give players less control over certain outcomes might actually help convey these historical realities better than previous installments where players could micromanage everything toward optimal results.
What many people don't realize is that the classic cowboy era was remarkably brief, really only dominating American culture from roughly 1867 to 1886, less than twenty years of significant influence. The great cattle drives that define our imagination were already declining by the 1880s due to railroad expansion and barbed wire fencing. This compressed timeline fascinates me as someone who's played every Civilization game since the second installment - we tend to think of historical eras as lengthy periods, but often they're surprisingly brief moments of transition. If Civilization VII's new period progression system captures these compressed transformative moments effectively, it could be one of the most historically authentic entries in the series.
The cultural impact of cowboys far outweighs their actual historical presence, which is something I find endlessly intriguing. Their brief moment in history spawned an entire mythology that continues to influence American identity globally. This disconnect between historical reality and cultural memory is exactly what makes me excited about game developers rethinking how we engage with history in interactive media. When I read that Civilization VII would feature mechanics that impact player control over certain outcomes, it struck me as potentially brilliant for capturing how historical developments often emerged from complex systems rather than individual decisions.
Personally, I've always been drawn to the less glamorous aspects of cowboy history - the loneliness, the harsh weather conditions, the surprisingly literate cowboys who carried books in their saddlebags. These nuances rarely make it into popular representations, and I'm curious whether Civilization VII's approach to historical periods will allow for these kinds of textured details. The development team's decision to make campaigns more dynamic rather than strictly player-controlled could create space for these humanizing details to emerge organically during gameplay.
The mythology around cowboys really took off precisely as the actual cowboy era was ending, with Buffalo Bill's Wild West shows launching in 1883 just as open range grazing was disappearing. This creation of nostalgia for a present that was already vanishing strikes me as particularly relevant to game design - we're often romanticizing systems even as we're changing them. As someone who's spent probably too many hours analyzing game mechanics, I appreciate when developers have the courage to make controversial changes, even if they might frustrate some longtime fans. The Civilization VII team seems to be walking this exact tightrope - preserving what works while innovating in ways that might initially discomfort players accustomed to total control.
Ultimately, what continues to fascinate me about cowboy history is how it reflects our ongoing relationship with the American past - we continually reshape it to serve contemporary needs. The changes coming to Civilization VII appear to embrace this complexity rather than shy away from it. While some players will undoubtedly lament reduced control over certain outcomes, I suspect these design choices will create a richer, more authentic historical experience. After all, history was never about total control - it's about navigating systems, responding to unexpected developments, and finding meaning in the interplay between structure and agency. If the new Civilization can capture even a fraction of that dynamic, it might just be the most thoughtful representation of history the series has ever attempted.
Share
